Advertisement
Advertisement
Coronavirus pandemic
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Post-Sars monitoring systems mean the coronavirus was first detected in Wuhan in central China, a top Chinese epidemiologist says. Photo: Xinhua

Coronavirus: China not the origin of the disease, top scientist says

  • Former Chinese CDC head epidemiologist says post-Sars monitoring systems meant the pathogen was first detected in Wuhan
  • Assessment comes after Italian researchers found signs of the pathogen circulating in Italy months before it was picked up in China
All available evidence indicates that the coronavirus, which has sickened more than 56 million people worldwide, may have first been identified in the central Chinese city of Wuhan but did not start there, according to one of the country’s leading scientists.

“Wuhan was where the coronavirus was first detected but it was not where it originated,” Zeng Guang, former chief epidemiologist of the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), told an online academic conference on Thursday.

Zeng is the second senior Chinese epidemiologist who has weighed in on the controversial topic in recent weeks.

Wu Zunyou, the CDC’s present chief epidemiologist, made a similar suggestion last week, saying the pathogen could have come into the country in imports of frozen seafood or meat products.

The comments come as a team assembled by the World Health Organisation investigates the origins of the coronavirus. The mission, which started late last month, began with online meetings between Chinese scientists and the WHO team, and was expected to include on-the-ground investigations at a later stage.

01:51

Coronavirus hunters find new evidence pointing to the virus originating in Italy

Coronavirus hunters find new evidence pointing to the virus originating in Italy

Speaking at the conference organised by US publisher Cell Press and the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission, Zeng noted “suspicious signs” from overseas related to the origins of the coronavirus, including positive test reports.

An Italian study found that antibodies specific to Sars-CoV-2 were detected in blood samples collected in a lung cancer screening trial between September 2019 and March this year.

According to the peer-reviewed research, 11.6 per cent of the 959 healthy volunteers had developed coronavirus antibodies before February.

In Milan on Thursday, the Italian researchers said their study did not “dispute” the origins of coronavirus.

“These findings simply document that the epidemic in China was not detected in time,” said Giovanni Apolone, scientific director of National Cancer Institute and a co-author of the study.

03:21

Chinese respiratory disease expert on origins of Covid-19 and Wuhan virus lab conspiracy theories

Chinese respiratory disease expert on origins of Covid-19 and Wuhan virus lab conspiracy theories
At the online conference, Zeng said the coronavirus was first detected in Wuhan thanks to the establishment of a pneumonia monitoring system set up in the aftermath of the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome, or Sars, 17 years ago.

“China has built a world-leading monitoring system to report unknown pneumonia since the outbreak of Sars in 2003. We always stay on high alert,” he said. “Thanks to this system, we are able to become the first in the world to identify Covid-19.”

China has said that the Italian study and the other similar research show that the origins of the virus are a complex scientific issue, and origin tracing is an ongoing process that may involve many countries.

“China will continue taking part in global scientific research in tracing the origin and transmission route of the virus, and work with the rest of the international community to contribute to global cooperation on fighting Covid-19 and other viruses,” Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said on Tuesday.

Additional reporting by Reuters

This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: Wuhan ‘not source of virus’
Post